Paper detail

Sharp Lp-entropy inequalities on manifolds

In 2003, Del Pino and Dolbeault [14] and Gentil [19] investigated, independently, best constants and extremals associated to Euclidean Lp-entropy inequalities for p > 1. In this work, we present some contributions in the Riemannian context. Namely, let (M,g) be a closed Riemannian manifold of dimension n >= 3. For 1 < p <= 2, we establish the validity of the sharp Riemannian Lp-entropy inequality int_M |u|^p log(|u|^p) dv_g <= n/p log ( A_{opt} int_M |Grad_g u|^p dv_g + B ) on all functions u em H^{1,p}(M) such that ||u||_{Lp(M)} = 1 for some constant B. Moreover, we prove that the first best constant A_{opt} is equal to the corresponding Euclidean one. Our approach is inspired on the Bakry, Coulhon, Ledoux and Sallof-Coste&#39;s idea [3] of getting Euclidean entropy inequalities as a limit case of suitable subcritical interpolation inequalities. It is conjectured that the inequality sometimes fails for p > 2.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.