Paper detail

Sharp estimation in sup norm with random design

The aim of this paper is to recover the regression function with sup norm loss. We construct an asymptotically sharp estimator which converges with the spatially dependent rate r\_{n, μ}(x) = P \big(\log n / (n μ(x)) \big)^{s / (2s + 1)}, where $μ$ is the design density, $s$ the regression smoothness, $n$ the sample size and $P$ is a constant expressed in terms of a solution to a problem of optimal recovery as in Donoho (1994). We prove this result under the assumption that $μ$ is positive and continuous. This estimator combines kernel and local polynomial methods, where the kernel is given by optimal recovery, which allows to prove the result up to the constants for any $s > 0$. Moreover, the estimator does not depend on $μ$. We prove that $r\_{n, μ}(x)$ is optimal in a sense which is stronger than the classical minimax lower bound. Then, an inhomogeneous confidence band is proposed. This band has a non constant length which depends on the local amount of data.

preprint2005arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.