Paper detail

Sharp Convergence Rate and Support Consistency of Multiple Kernel Learning with Sparse and Dense Regularization

We theoretically investigate the convergence rate and support consistency (i.e., correctly identifying the subset of non-zero coefficients in the large sample limit) of multiple kernel learning (MKL). We focus on MKL with block-l1 regularization (inducing sparse kernel combination), block-l2 regularization (inducing uniform kernel combination), and elastic-net regularization (including both block-l1 and block-l2 regularization). For the case where the true kernel combination is sparse, we show a sharper convergence rate of the block-l1 and elastic-net MKL methods than the existing rate for block-l1 MKL. We further show that elastic-net MKL requires a milder condition for being consistent than block-l1 MKL. For the case where the optimal kernel combination is not exactly sparse, we prove that elastic-net MKL can achieve a faster convergence rate than the block-l1 and block-l2 MKL methods by carefully controlling the balance between the block-l1and block-l2 regularizers. Thus, our theoretical results overall suggest the use of elastic-net regularization in MKL.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.