Paper detail

Sharp adaptive nonparametric testing for Sobolev ellipsoids

We consider testing for presence of a signal in Gaussian white noise with intensity 1/sqrt(n), when the alternatives are given by smoothness ellipsoids with an L2-ball of (squared) radius rho removed. It is known that, for a fixed Sobolev type ellipsoid of smoothness beta and size M, a rho which is of order n to the power -4 beta/(4 beta+1)} is the critical separation rate, in the sense that the minimax error of second kind over alpha-tests stays asymptotically between 0 and 1 strictly (Ingster, 1982). In addition, Ermakov (1990) found the sharp asymptotics of the minimax error of second kind at the separation rate. For adaptation over both beta and M in that context, it is known that a loglog-penalty over the separation rate for rho is necessary for a nonzero asymptotic power. Here, following an example in nonparametric estimation related to the Pinsker constant, we investigate the adaptation problem over the ellipsoid size M only, for fixed smoothness degree beta. It is established that the sharp risk asymptotics can be replicated in that adaptive setting, if rho tends to zero slower than the separation rate. The penalty for adaptation here turns out to be a sequence tending to infinity arbitrarily slowly.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.