Paper detail

Seven steps to reliable cyclic voltammetry measurements for the determination of double layer capacitance

Discovery of electrocatalytic materials for high-performance energy conversion and storage applications relies on the adequate characterization of their intrinsic activity, which is currently hindered by the dearth of a protocol for consistent and precise determination of double layer capacitance (CDL). Herein, we propose a seven-step method that aims to determine CDL reliably by scan rate-dependent cyclic voltammetry. The method considers three aspects that strongly influence the outcome of the analysis: measurement settings, data collection, and data processing. To illustrate the proposed method, two systems were studied: a resistor-capacitor electric circuit and a glassy carbon disk in an electrochemical cell. With these studies it is demonstrated that when any of the mentioned aspects of the procedure are neglected, substantial deviations of the results are observed with misestimations as large as 61% in the case of the investigated electrochemical system. Moreover, we propose allometric regression as a more suitable model than linear regression for the determination of CDL for both the ideal and the non-ideal systems investigated. We stress the importance of assessing the accuracy of not only highly specialized electrochemical methods, but also of those that are well-known and commonly used as it is the case of the voltammetric methods. The methodology proposed herein is not limited to the determination of CDL, but can be effectively applied to any other voltammetry-based analysis that aims to deliver quantitative results.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.