Paper detail

Seven, eight, and nine mutually touching infinitely long straight round cylinders: Entanglement in Euclidean space

It has been a challenge to make seven straight round cylinders mutually touch before our now 10-year old discovery [Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 015505 (2004)] of configurations of seven mutually touching infinitely long round cylinders (then coined 7-knots). Because of the current interest in string-like objects and entanglement which occur in many fields of Physics it is useful to find a simple way to treat ensembles of straight infinite cylinders. Here we propose a treatment with a chirality matrix. By comparing 7-knot with variable radii with the one where all cylinders are of equal radii (here 7*-knot, which for the first time appeared in [phys. stat. solidi, b 246, 2098 (2009)]), we show that the reduction of 7-knot with a set of non-equal cylinder radii to 7*-knot of equal radii is possible only for one topologically unique configuration, all other 7-knots being of different topology. We found novel configurations for mutually touching infinitely long round cylinders when their numbers are eight and ultimately nine (here coined 8-knots and 9-knots). Unlike the case of 7-knot, where one angular parameter (for a given set of fixed radii) may change by sweeping a scissor angle between two chosen cylinders, in case of 8- and 9-knots their degrees of freedom are completely exhausted by mutual touching so that their configurations are "frozen" for each given set of radii. For 8-knot the radii of any six cylinders may be changeable (for example, all taken equal) while two remaining are uniquely determined by the others. We show that 9-knot makes the ultimate configuration where only three cylinders can have changeable radii and the remaining six are determined by the three. Possible generalizations and connection with Physics are mentioned.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.