Paper detail

Setup of high resolution thermal expansion measurements in closed cycle cryostats using capacitive dilatometers

We present high resolution thermal expansion measurement data obtained with high relative sensitivity of $Δ$L$/$L = 10$^{-9}$ and accuracy of $\pm$2$\%$ using closed cycle refrigerators employing two different dilatometers. The data quality is in excellent agreement with those obtained using wet liquid helium based systems, demonstrating great technological possibilities for future thermal expansion measurements in view of the depleting resource of liquid helium. The cryogenic environment was achieved using two different cryostats that use pulse tube and Gifford-Mcmahon coolers as the cryocoolers. Both the dilatometers employ a spring movement for achieving the parallel movement of the capacitor plates. $Dilatometer \#1$ was built in-house based on a published design while $dilatometer \#2$ was obtained commercially. Cell calibration for $dilatometer \#1$ was done using copper and minimal deviation of the cell effect from the published values were found. Linear thermal expansion coefficient $α$ obtained using both dilatometers was evaluated using two different techniques, namely, numerical differentiation and derivative of a polynomial fit. The resultant $α$ obtained for metals silver and aluminium showed excellent match with published values obtained on systems using wet cryostats. Finite element method simulations were performed for understanding the spring movement in each dilatometer using which the effect of different forces$/$pressures on the displacement of the spring was studied. Finally, we report thermal expansion measurements done on single crystals of two high temperature superconductors YBa$_2$Cu$_{3-x}$Al$_x$O$_{6+δ}$ and Bi$_2$Sr$_2$CaCu$_2$O$_{8+x}$ along the c-axis and found very good match with published data obtained using wet liquid helium based cryostats.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access9 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.