Paper detail

Set Estimation Under Biconvexity Restrictions

A set in the Euclidean plane is said to be biconvex if, for some angle $θ\in[0,π/2)$, all its sections along straight lines with inclination angles $θ$ and $θ+π/2$ are convex sets (i.e, empty sets or segments). Biconvexity is a natural notion with some useful applications in optimization theory. It has also be independently used, under the name of "rectilinear convexity", in computational geometry. We are concerned here with the problem of asymptotically reconstructing (or estimating) a biconvex set $S$ from a random sample of points drawn on $S$. By analogy with the classical convex case, one would like to define the "biconvex hull" of the sample points as a natural estimator for $S$. However, as previously pointed out by several authors, the notion of "hull" for a given set $A$ (understood as the "minimal" set including $A$ and having the required property) has no obvious, useful translation to the biconvex case. This is in sharp contrast with the well-known elementary definition of convex hull. Thus, we have selected the most commonly accepted notion of "biconvex hull" (often called "rectilinear convex hull"): we first provide additional motivations for this definition, proving some useful relations with other convexity-related notions. Then, we prove some results concerning the consistent approximation of a biconvex set $S$ and and the corresponding biconvex hull. An analogous result is also provided for the boundaries. A method to approximate, from a sample of points on $S$, the biconvexity angle $θ$ is also given.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.