Paper detail

Separating Varying Numbers of Sources with Auxiliary Autoencoding Loss

Many recent source separation systems are designed to separate a fixed number of sources out of a mixture. In the cases where the source activation patterns are unknown, such systems have to either adjust the number of outputs or to identify invalid outputs from the valid ones. Iterative separation methods have gain much attention in the community as they can flexibly decide the number of outputs, however (1) they typically rely on long-term information to determine the stopping time for the iterations, which makes them hard to operate in a causal setting; (2) they lack a "fault tolerance" mechanism when the estimated number of sources is different from the actual number. In this paper, we propose a simple training method, the auxiliary autoencoding permutation invariant training (A2PIT), to alleviate the two issues. A2PIT assumes a fixed number of outputs and uses auxiliary autoencoding loss to force the invalid outputs to be the copies of the input mixture, and detects invalid outputs in a fully unsupervised way during inference phase. Experiment results show that A2PIT is able to improve the separation performance across various numbers of speakers and effectively detect the number of speakers in a mixture.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.