Paper detail

Sensitivity of the neutron star r-mode instability window to the density dependence of the nuclear symmetry energy

Using a simple model of a neutron star with a perfectly rigid crust constructed and a set of crust and core equations of state that span the range of nuclear experimental uncertainty in the density dependence of the symmetry energy from 25 MeV (soft EOS) to 115 MeV (stiff EOS), we calculate the instability window for the onset of the Chandrasekhar-Friedmann-Schutz (CFS) instability in r-mode oscillations for canonical neutron stars (1.4 M_{\odot}) and massive neutron stars (2.0 M_{\odot}). In these models the crust-core transition density, and thus crustal thickness, is calculated consistently with the core equation of state (EOS). For the canonical neutron star, the lower bound of the r-mode instability window is reduced in frequency by \approx150 Hz from the softest to the stiffest symmetry energy used, independent of mass and temperature. The instability window also drops by \approx 100 Hz independent of EOS when the mass is raised from 1.4 M_{\odot} to 2.0 M_{\odot}. Where temperature estimates are available, the observed neutron stars in low mass X-ray binaries (LMXBs) have frequencies below the instability window for the 1.4 M_{\odot} models, while some LMXBs fall within the instability window for 2.0 M_{\odot} stars if the symmetry energy is relatively stiff, indicating that a softer symmetry energy is more consistent with observations within this model. Thus we conclude that smaller values of L help stabilize neutron stars against runaway r-mode oscillations. The critical temperature, below which no star can reach the instability window without exceeding its Kepler frequency, varies by nearly an order of magnitude from soft to stiff symmetry energies. When the crust thickness and core EOS are treated consistently, a thicker crust corresponds to a lower critical temperature, the opposite result to previous studies in which the transition density was independent of the core EOS.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.