Paper detail

Sensitivity of the evaporation residue observables to the symmetry energy

The static properties of the heaviest residue and unbound particles produced in central $^{64,58}Ni$ on $^{64,58}Ni$ collisions at 50 MeV/nucleon are predicted within the BUU transport model, in order to explore the sensitivity of those observables to the density dependence of the symmetry energy. We include fluctuations in the collision integral and use a meta-modelling for the mean-field which allows an independent variation of the different empirical parameters of the equation of state. We find that the isospin ratio of pre-equilibrium particles is a good estimator of the stiffness of the symmetry energy, in agreement with previous works. In addition to that, whatever be the functional form of the equation of state, we show that a higher symmetry energy at subsaturation densities leads to an increased size and isotopic ratio for the heaviest residue. This is understood in terms of energy sharing between the pre-equilibrium particles and the (quasi)fused system. The combination of the two observables might be an interesting tool to constrain the different density dependence below and above saturation, which is linked to the relatively poorly known parameter $K_{sym}$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.