Paper detail

Sensitivity of Niobium Superconducting Cavities to Trapped Magnetic Flux Dissipation

Future particle accelerators such as the the SLAC ``Linac Coherent Light Source-II'' (LCLS-II) and the proposed Cornell Energy Recovery Linac (ERL) require hundreds of superconducting radio-frequency (SRF) cavities operating in continuous wave (CW) mode. In order to achieve economic feasibility of projects such as these, the cavities must achieve a very high intrinsic quality factor ($Q_0$) to keep cryogenic losses within feasible limits. To reach these high $Q_0$'s in the case of LCLS-II, nitrogen-doping has been proposed as a cavity preparation technique. When dealing with $Q_0$'s greater than 1\e{10}, the effects of ambient magnetic field on $Q_0$ become significant. Here we show that the sensitivity to RF losses from trapped magnetic field in a cavity's walls is strongly dependent on the cavity preparation. Specifically, standard electropolished and 120$^\circ$C baked cavities show a residual resistance sensitivity to trapped magnetic flux of $\sim0.6$ and $\sim0.8$ n$Ω$/mG trapped, respectively, while nitrogen-doped cavities show a sensitivity of $\sim$ 1 to 5 n$Ω$/mG trapped. We show that this difference in sensitivities is directly related to the mean free path of the RF surface layer of the niobium: shorter mean free paths lead to less residual resistance sensitivity to trapped magnetic flux in the dirty limit ($\ell<<ξ_0$) while longer mean free paths lead to lower sensitivity in the clean limit ($\ell>>ξ_0$). These experimental results are also shown to have good agreement with recent theoretical predictions for pinned vortex lines oscillating in RF fields.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.