Paper detail

Semiparametric posterior limits

We review the Bayesian theory of semiparametric inference following Bickel and Kleijn (2012) and Kleijn and Knapik (2013). After an overview of efficiency in parametric and semiparametric estimation problems, we consider the Bernstein-von Mises theorem (see, e.g., Le Cam and Yang (1990)) and generalize it to (LAN) regular and (LAE) irregular semiparametric estimation problems. We formulate a version of the semiparametric Bernstein-von Mises theorem that does not depend on least-favourable submodels, thus bypassing the most restrictive condition in the presentation of Bickel and Kleijn (2012). The results are applied to the (regular) estimation of the linear coefficient in partial linear regression (with a Gaussian nuisance prior) and of the kernel bandwidth in a model of normal location mixtures (with a Dirichlet nuisance prior), as well as the (irregular) estimation of the boundary of the support of a monotone family of densities (with a Gaussian nuisance prior).

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.