Paper detail

Semileptonic decays $B_c \to (η_c,J/ψ) l \barν_l $ in the "PQCD + Lattice" approach

In this paper, we studied the semileptonic decays $B_c^- \to (η_c, J/ψ) l ^- \barν_l$ by employing the PQCD factorization approach, using the newly defined distribution amplitudes of the $B_c$ meson and the new kind of parametrization for extrapolation of the form factors , and also taking into account the lattice QCD results about the relevant form factors at several points. We found the following main results: (a) the PQCD predictions for the branching ratios of $B_c \to (η_c,J/ψ) l \barν$ decays will become a little smaller by about $(5-16)\%$ when the lattice input are taken into account in the extrapolation of the relevant form factors; (b) the PQCD predictions for the ratio $R_{η_c, J/ψ}$ and the longitudinal polarization $P_τ$ are $R_{η_c}=0.34\pm 0.01 , R_{J/ψ}=0.28\pm 0.01$, $P_τ(η_c) = 0.37\pm 0.01$ and $P_τ(J/ψ) = -0.55 \pm 0.01$ ; and (c) after the inclusion of the lattice input the theoretical predictions changed slightly: $R_{η_c}=0.31\pm 0.01$, $ R_{ J/ψ}=0.27\pm 0.01$, $P_τ( η_c) = 0.36 \pm 0.01$ and $P_τ( J/ψ) = -0.53\pm 0.01$. The theoretical predictions for $R_{ J/ψ}$ agree with the measured one within errors, and other predictions could be tested in the near future LHCb experiments.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.