Paper detail

Semileptonic decays $B/B_s \to (D^{(*)},D_s^{(*)}) l ν_l$ in the PQCD approach with the lattice QCD input

In this paper, we studied the semileptonic $B/B_s \to (D^{(*)},D_s^{(*)}) lν_l$ decays in the framework of the standard model (SM) , by employing the perturbative QCD (PQCD) factorization formalism combining with the lattice QCD inputs of the relevant transition form factors. We calculated the branching ratios ${\cal B}(B_{(s)} \to D_{(s)}^{(*)} l ν_l )$ with $l=(e,μ.τ)$ , the ratios of the branching ratios $R(D^{(*)})$ and $R(D_s^{(*)} )$ and other physical observables $P_τ(D_{(s)}^{(*)})$, $F_L(D^*_{(s)})$ and $A_{FB}(τ)$. The "PQCD+Lattice" predictions for ${\cal B}(B \to D^{(*)} lν_l)$ and $R(D^{(*)})$ do agree well with those currently available experimental measurements within the errors. For the ratios $R(D_s)$ and $R(D_s^*)$, the "PQCD+Lattice" predictions agree well with other known predictions. For both $P_τ(D^*)$ and $F_L(D^*)$, our theoretical predictions agree well with the measured values within errors. Our theoretical predictions about the considered semileptonic $B/B_s$ decays could be tested in the near future LHCb and the Belle II experiments.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.