Paper detail

Semi-supervised lung nodule retrieval

Content based image retrieval (CBIR) provides the clinician with visual information that can support, and hopefully improve, his or her decision making process. Given an input query image, a CBIR system provides as its output a set of images, ranked by similarity to the query image. Retrieved images may come with relevant information, such as biopsy-based malignancy labeling, or categorization. Ground truth on similarity between dataset elements (e.g. between nodules) is not readily available, thus greatly challenging machine learning methods. Such annotations are particularly difficult to obtain, due to the subjective nature of the task, with high inter-observer variability requiring multiple expert annotators. Consequently, past approaches have focused on manual feature extraction, while current approaches use auxiliary tasks, such as a binary classification task (e.g. malignancy), for which ground-true is more readily accessible. However, in a previous study, we have shown that binary auxiliary tasks are inferior to the usage of a rough similarity estimate that are derived from data annotations. The current study suggests a semi-supervised approach that involves two steps: 1) Automatic annotation of a given partially labeled dataset; 2) Learning a semantic similarity metric space based on the predicated annotations. The proposed system is demonstrated in lung nodule retrieval using the LIDC dataset, and shows that it is feasible to learn embedding from predicted ratings. The semi-supervised approach has demonstrated a significantly higher discriminative ability than the fully-unsupervised reference.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.