Paper detail

Semantics between customers and providers: The relation between product descriptions, reviews, and customer satisfaction in E-commerce

In social commerce, users dialogue with each other on the topics related to the providers' products. However, the language customers use may vary from the language vendors use on their e-commerce websites and product descriptions. This situation can lead to possible misunderstandings in the social dialogue between customers, and incidental costs in the dialogue between customers and vendors. One possible reason for this difference is that words used by customers may have different meanings compared to those used by product description writers. We present a novel approach to measure this potential lexical-semantic gap for various e-commerce domains using an information-theoretical approach based on a large corpus of user reviews and product descriptions. Additionally, we use neural word embeddings to identify words with the highest semantic drift between reviews and descriptions as a tool to construct a ground truth for the task. We found that low levels of lexical-semantic gap are related to better customer satisfaction. Besides, this work is a step towards a better understanding of the effect of the use of language in e-commerce and social commerce. Potential applications of this technology could lead to better communication between customers and improvements in customer satisfaction, services, and revenue. Furthermore, this study opens up perspectives for applications in other domains with relationships beyond client-vendor, such as citizen-government and patient-healthcare system.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.