Paper detail

Semantically Proportional Patchmix for Few-Shot Learning

Few-shot learning aims to classify unseen classes with only a limited number of labeled data. Recent works have demonstrated that training models with a simple transfer learning strategy can achieve competitive results in few-shot classification. Although excelling at distinguishing training data, these models are not well generalized to unseen data, probably due to insufficient feature representations on evaluation. To tackle this issue, we propose Semantically Proportional Patchmix (SePPMix), in which patches are cut and pasted among training images and the ground truth labels are mixed proportionally to the semantic information of the patches. In this way, we can improve the generalization ability of the model by regional dropout effect without introducing severe label noise. To learn more robust representations of data, we further take rotate transformation on the mixed images and predict rotations as a rule-based regularizer. Extensive experiments on prevalent few-shot benchmarks have shown the effectiveness of our proposed method.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.