Paper detail

Semantically-Conditioned Negative Samples for Efficient Contrastive Learning

Negative sampling is a limiting factor w.r.t. the generalization of metric-learned neural networks. We show that uniform negative sampling provides little information about the class boundaries and thus propose three novel techniques for efficient negative sampling: drawing negative samples from (1) the top-$k$ most semantically similar classes, (2) the top-$k$ most semantically similar samples and (3) interpolating between contrastive latent representations to create pseudo negatives. Our experiments on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100 and Tiny-ImageNet-200 show that our proposed \textit{Semantically Conditioned Negative Sampling} and Latent Mixup lead to consistent performance improvements. In the standard supervised learning setting, on average we increase test accuracy by 1.52\% percentage points on CIFAR-10 across various network architectures. In the knowledge distillation setting, (1) the performance of student networks increase by 4.56\% percentage points on Tiny-ImageNet-200 and 3.29\% on CIFAR-100 over student networks trained with no teacher and (2) 1.23\% and 1.72\% respectively over a \textit{hard-to-beat} baseline (Hinton et al., 2015).

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.