Paper detail

Self-Paced Deep Regression Forests with Consideration of Ranking Fairness

Deep discriminative models (DDMs), e.g. deep regression forests and deep decision forests, have been extensively studied recently to solve problems such as facial age estimation, head pose estimation, etc.. Due to a shortage of well-labeled data that does not have noise and imbalanced distribution problems, learning DDMs is always challenging. Existing methods usually tackle these challenges through learning more discriminative features or re-weighting samples. We argue that learning DDMs gradually, from easy to hard, is more reasonable, for two reasons. First, this is more consistent with the cognitive process of human beings. Second, noisy as well as underrepresented examples can be distinguished by virtue of previously learned knowledge. Thus, we resort to a gradual learning strategy -- self-paced learning (SPL). Then, a natural question arises: can SPL lead DDMs to achieve more robust and less biased solutions? To answer this question, this paper proposes a new SPL method: easy and underrepresented examples first, for learning DDMs. This tackles the fundamental ranking and selection problem in SPL from a new perspective: fairness. Our idea is fundamental and can be easily combined with a variety of DDMs. Extensive experimental results on three computer vision tasks, i.e., facial age estimation, head pose estimation, and gaze estimation, show our new method gains considerable performance improvement in both accuracy and fairness. Source code is available at https://github.com/learninginvision/SPU.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.