Paper detail

Self-Organized Criticality and Universality in a Nonconservative Earthquake Model

We make an extensive numerical study of a two dimensional nonconservative model proposed by Olami-Feder-Christensen to describe earthquake behavior. By analyzing the distribution of earthquake sizes using a multiscaling method, we find evidence that the model is critical, with no characteristic length scale other than the system size, in agreement with previous results. However, in contrast to previous claims, we find convergence to universal behaviour as the system size increases, over a range of values of the dissipation parameter, $α$. We also find that both ``free'' and ``open'' boundary conditions tend to the same result. Our analysis indicates that, as $L$ increases, the behaviour slowly converges toward a power law distribution of earthquake sizes $P(s) \sim s^{-τ}$ with exponent $τ\simeq 1.8$. The universal value of $τ$ we find numerically agrees quantitatively with the empirical value ($τ=B+1$) associated with the Gutenberg-Richter law.

preprint2000arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.