Paper detail

Self-critical Sequence Training for Automatic Speech Recognition

Although automatic speech recognition (ASR) task has gained remarkable success by sequence-to-sequence models, there are two main mismatches between its training and testing that might lead to performance degradation: 1) The typically used cross-entropy criterion aims to maximize log-likelihood of the training data, while the performance is evaluated by word error rate (WER), not log-likelihood; 2) The teacher-forcing method leads to the dependence on ground truth during training, which means that model has never been exposed to its own prediction before testing. In this paper, we propose an optimization method called self-critical sequence training (SCST) to make the training procedure much closer to the testing phase. As a reinforcement learning (RL) based method, SCST utilizes a customized reward function to associate the training criterion and WER. Furthermore, it removes the reliance on teacher-forcing and harmonizes the model with respect to its inference procedure. We conducted experiments on both clean and noisy speech datasets, and the results show that the proposed SCST respectively achieves 8.7% and 7.8% relative improvements over the baseline in terms of WER.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.