Paper detail

Self-Consistent Stochastic Model Errors in Data Assimilation

In using data assimilation to import information from observations to estimate parameters and state variables of a model, one must assume a distribution for the noise in the measurements and in the model errors. Using the path integral formulation of data assimilation~ cite{abar2009}, we introduce the idea of self consistency of the distribution of stochastic model errors: the distribution of model errors from the path integral with observed data should be consistent with the assumption made in formulating the the path integral. The path integral setting for data assimilation is discussed to provide the setting for the consistency test. Using two examples drawn from the 1996 Lorenz model, for $D = 100$ and for $D = 20$ we show how one can test for this inconsistency with essential no additional effort than that expended in extracting answers to interesting questions from data assimilation itself. \end{abstract}

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.