Paper detail

Self-consistent statistical error analysis of $ππ$ scattering

We analyze the conditions under which a statistical error analysis can be carried out in the case of $ππ$ scattering, namely the normality of residuals in the conventional $χ^2$-fit method. Here we check that the current and benchmarking analyses only present very small violations of the normality requirements. In particular, we show how it is possible to amend slightly the selection of the experimental data, and improve the normality of residuals. As an example, we discuss the $0^{++}$ channel and the implications for the $f_0(500)$ and $f_0(980)$ resonances, obtaining that the new selection of data provides very similar and compatible results. In addition, the effect on the $f_0(500)$ and $f_0(980)$ resonance pole parameters is almost negligible, which reinforces the central results and the uncertainty analysis performed in these benchmarking determinations.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.