Paper detail

Self-consistent formulations for stochastic nonlinear neuronal dynamics

Neural dynamics is often investigated with tools from bifurcation theory. However, many neuron models are stochastic, mimicking fluctuations in the input from unknown parts of the brain or the spiking nature of signals. Noise changes the dynamics with respect to the deterministic model; in particular bifurcation theory cannot be applied. We formulate stochastic neuronal dynamics in the Martin-Siggia-Rose de Dominicis-Janssen (MSRDJ) formalism and present the fluctuation expansion of the effective action and the functional renormalization group (fRG) as two systematic ways to incorporate corrections to the mean dynamics and time-dependent statistics due to fluctuations in the presence of nonlinear neuronal gain. To formulate self-consistency equations, we derive a fundamental link between the effective action in the Onsager-Machlup(OM) formalism, which allows the study of phase transitions, and the MSRDJ effective action, which is computationally advantageous. These results in particular allow the derivation of an OM effective action for systems with non-Gaussian noise. This approach naturally leads to effective deterministic equations for the first moment of the stochastic system; they explain how nonlinearities and noise cooperate to produce memory effects. Moreover, the MSRDJ formulation yields an effective linear system that has identical power spectra and linear response. Starting from the better known loopwise approximation, we then discuss the use of the fRG as a method to obtain self-consistency beyond the mean. We present a new efficient truncation scheme for the hierarchy of flow equations for the vertex functions by adapting the Blaizot, Méndez and Wschebor approximation from the derivative expansion to the vertex expansion. The methods are presented by means of the simplest possible example of a stochastic differential equation that has generic features of neuronal dynamics.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.