Paper detail

Self-consistent Continuum Random Phase Approximation calculations with finite-range interactions

We present a technique which allows us to solve the Random Phase Approximation equations with finite-range interactions and treats the continuum part of the excitation spectrum without approximations. The interaction used in the Hartree-Fock calculations to generate the single particle basis is also used in the Continuum Random Phase Approximation calculations. We present results for the electric dipole and quadrupole excitations in the $^{16}$O, $^{22}$O, $^{24}$O, $^{40}$Ca, $^{48}$Ca and $^{52}$Ca nuclei. We compare our results with those of the traditional discrete Random Phase Approximation, with the continuum mean-field results and with the results obtained by a phenomenological approach. We study the relevance of the continuum, of the residual interaction and of the self-consistency. We also compare our results with the available total photoabsorption cross section data. We compare our photoabsorption cross section in $^4$He with that obtained by a calculation which uses a microscopic interaction.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.