Paper detail

Self-consistency of optimizing finite-time Carnot engines with the low-dissipation model

The efficiency at the maximum power (EMP) for finite-time Carnot engines established with the low-dissipation model, relies significantly on the assumption of the inverse proportion scaling of the irreversible entropy generation $ΔS^{(\mathrm{ir})}$ on the operation time $τ$, i.e., $ΔS^{(\mathrm{ir})}\propto1/τ$. The optimal operation time of the finite-time isothermal process for EMP has to be within the valid regime of the inverse proportion scaling. Yet, such consistency was not tested due to the unknown coefficient of the $1/τ$-scaling. In this paper, using a two-level atomic heat engine as an illustration, we reveal that the optimization of the finite-time Carnot engines with the low-dissipation model is self-consistent only in the regime of $η_{\mathrm{C}}\ll1$, where $η_{\mathrm{C}}$ is the Carnot efficiency. In the large-$η_{\mathrm{C}}$ regime, the operation time for EMP obtained with the low-dissipation model is not within the valid regime of the $1/τ$-scaling, and the exact EMP is found to surpass the well-known bound $η_{+}=η_{\mathrm{C}}/(2-η_{\mathrm{C}})$

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.