Paper detail

Segmentation analysis and the recovery of queuing parameters via the Wasserstein distance: a study of administrative data for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

This work uses a data-driven approach to analyse how the resource requirements of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) may change, quantifying how those changes impact the hospital system with which the patients interact. This approach is composed of a novel combination of often distinct modes of analysis: segmentation, operational queuing theory, and the recovery of parameters from incomplete data. By combining these methods as presented here, this work demonstrates that potential limitations around the availability of fine-grained data can be overcome. Thus, finding useful operational results despite using only administrative data. The paper begins by finding a useful clustering of the population from this granular data that feeds into a multi-class M/M/c model, whose parameters are recovered from the data via parameterisation and the Wasserstein distance. This model is then used to conduct an informative analysis of the underlying queuing system and the needs of the population under study through several what-if scenarios. The analyses used to form and study this model consider, in effect, all types of patient arrivals and how those types impact the system. With that, this study finds that there are no quick solutions to reduce the impact of COPD patients on the system, including adding capacity to the system. In this analysis, the only effective intervention to reduce the strain caused by those presenting with COPD is to enact external policies which directly improve the overall health of the COPD population before they arrive at the hospital.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.