Paper detail

Seebeck coefficient in a cuprate superconductor: particle-hole asymmetry in the strange metal phase and Fermi surface transformation in the pseudogap phase

We report measurements of the Seebeck effect in both the $ab$ plane ($S_{\rm a}$) and along the $c$ axis ($S_{\rm c}$) of the cuprate superconductor La$_{1.6-x}$Nd$_{0.4}$Sr$_{x}$CuO$_4$ (Nd-LSCO), performed in magnetic fields large enough to suppress superconductivity down to low temperature. We use the Seebeck coefficient as a probe of the particle-hole asymmetry of the electronic structure across the pseudogap critical doping $p^{\star} = 0.23$. Outside the pseudogap phase, at $p = 0.24 > p^{\star}$, we observe a positive and essentially isotropic Seebeck coefficient as $T \rightarrow 0$. That $S > 0$ at $p = 0.24$ is at odds with expectations given the electronic band structure of Nd-LSCO above $p^{\star}$ and its known electron-like Fermi surface. We can reconcile this observation by invoking an energy-dependent scattering rate with a particle-hole asymmetry, possibly rooted in the non-Fermi liquid nature of cuprates just above $p^{\star}$. Inside the pseudogap phase, for $ p < p^{\star}$, $S_{\rm a}$ is seen to rise at low temperature as previously reported, consistent with the drop in carrier density $n$ from $n \simeq 1 + p$ to $n \simeq p$ across $p^{\star}$ as inferred from other transport properties. In stark contrast, $S_{\rm c}$ at low temperature becomes negative below $p^{\star}$, a novel signature of the pseudogap phase. The sudden drop in $S_{\rm c}$ reveals a change in the electronic structure of Nd-LSCO upon crossing $p^{\star}$. We can exclude a profound change of the scattering across $p^{\star}$ and conclude that the change in the out-of-plane Seebeck coefficient originates from a transformation of the Fermi surface.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access11 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.