Paper detail

Secure and Fault Tolerant Decentralized Learning

Federated learning (FL) is a promising paradigm for training a global model over data distributed across multiple data owners without centralizing clients' raw data. However, sharing of local model updates can also reveal information of clients' local datasets. Trusted execution environments (TEEs) within the FL server have been recently deployed by companies like Meta for secure aggregation. However, secure aggregation can suffer from error-prone local updates sent by clients that become faulty during training due to underlying device malfunctions. Also, data heterogeneity across clients makes fault mitigation challenging, as even updates from normal clients are dissimilar. Thus, most of the prior fault tolerant methods, which treat any local update differing from the majority of other updates as faulty, perform poorly. We propose DiverseFL to make model aggregation secure as well as robust to faults. In DiverseFL, any client whose local model update diverges from its associated guiding update is tagged as being faulty. To implement our novel per-client criteria for fault mitigation, DiverseFL creates a TEE-based secure enclave within the FL server, which in addition to performing secure aggregation for carrying out the global model update step, securely receives a small representative sample of local data from each client only once before training, and computes guiding updates for each participating client during training. Thus, DiverseFL provides security against privacy leakage as well as robustness against faulty clients. In experiments, DiverseFL consistently achieves significant improvements in absolute test accuracy over prior fault mitigation benchmarks. DiverseFL also performs closely to OracleSGD, where server combines updates only from the normal clients. We also analyze the convergence rate of DiverseFL under non-IID data and standard convexity assumptions.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.