Paper detail

Secrecy Capacity of Two-Hop Relay Assisted Wiretap Channels

Incorporating the physical layer characteristics to secure communications has received considerable attention in recent years. Moreover, cooperation with some nodes of network can give benefits of multiple-antenna systems, increasing the secrecy capacity of such channels. In this paper, we consider cooperative wiretap channel with the help of an Amplify and Forward (AF) relay to transmit confidential messages from source to legitimate receiver in the presence of an eavesdropper. In this regard, the secrecy capacity of AF relying is derived, assuming the relay is subject to a peak power constraint. To this end, an achievable secrecy rate for Gaussian input is evaluated through solving a non-convex optimization problem. Then, it is proved that any rates greater than this secrecy rate is not achievable. To do this, the capacity of a genie-aided channel as an upper bound for the secrecy capacity of the underlying channel is derived, showing this upper bound is equal to the computed achievable secrecy rate with Gaussian input. Accordingly, the corresponding secrecy capacity is compared to the Decode and Forward (DF) strategy which is served as the benchmark in the current work.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.