Paper detail

Searching for Pneumothorax in X-Ray Images Using Autoencoded Deep Features

Fast diagnosis and treatment of pneumothorax, a collapsed or dropped lung, is crucial to avoid fatalities. Pneumothorax is typically detected on a chest X-ray image through visual inspection by experienced radiologists. However, the detection rate is quite low. Therefore, there is a strong need for automated detection systems to assist radiologists. Despite the high accuracy levels generally reported for deep learning classifiers in many applications, they may not be useful in clinical practice due to the lack of large number of high-quality labelled images as well as a lack of interpretation possibility. Alternatively, searching in the archive of past cases to find matching images may serve as a 'virtual second opinion' through accessing the metadata of matched evidently diagnosed cases. To use image search as a triaging/diagnosis tool, all chest X-ray images must first be tagged with identifiers, i.e., deep features. Then, given a query chest X-ray image, the majority vote among the top k retrieved images can provide a more explainable output. While image search can be clinically more viable, its detection performance needs to be investigated at a scale closer to real-world practice. We combined 3 public datasets to assemble a repository with more than 550,000 chest X-ray images. We developed the Autoencoding Thorax Net (short AutoThorax-Net) for image search in chest radiographs compressing three inputs: the left chest side, the flipped right side, and the entire chest image. Experimental results show that image search based on AutoThorax-Net features can achieve high identification rates providing a path towards real-world deployment. We achieved 92% AUC accuracy for a semi-automated search in 194,608 images (pneumothorax and normal) and 82% AUC accuracy for fully automated search in 551,383 images (normal, pneumothorax and many other chest diseases).

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.