Paper detail

Searching for New Physics in Rare $K$ and $B$ Decays without $|V_{cb}|$ and $|V_{ub}|$ Uncertainties

We reemphasize the strong dependence of the branching ratios $B(K^+\toπ^+ν\barν)$ and $B(K_L\toπ^0ν\barν)$ on $|V_{cb}|$ that is stronger than in rare $B$ decays, in particular for $K_L\toπ^0ν\barν$. Thereby the persistent tension between inclusive and exclusive determinations of $|V_{cb}|$ weakens the power of these theoretically clean decays in the search for new physics (NP). We demonstrate how this uncertainty can be practically removed by considering within the SM suitable ratios of the two branching ratios between each other and with other observables like the branching ratios for $K_S\toμ^+μ^-$, $B_{s,d}\toμ^+μ^-$ and $B\to K(K^*)ν\barν$. We use as basic CKM parameters $V_{us}$, $|V_{cb}|$ and the angles $β$ and $γ$ in the unitarity triangle (UT). This avoids the use of the problematic $|V_{ub}|$. A ratio involving $B(K^+\toπ^+ν\barν)$ and $B(B_s\toμ^+μ^-)$ while being $|V_{cb}|$-independent exhibits sizable dependence on the angle $γ$. It should be of interest for several experimental groups in the coming years. We point out that the $|V_{cb}|$-independent ratio of $B(B^+\to K^+ν\barν)$ and $B(B_s\toμ^+μ^-)$ from Belle II and LHCb signals a $1.8σ$ tension with its SM value. As a complementary test of the Standard Model, we propose to extract $|V_{cb}|$ from different observables as a function of $β$ and $γ$. We illustrate this with $ε_K$, $ΔM_d$ and $ΔM_s$ finding tensions between these three determinations of $|V_{cb}|$ within the SM. From $ΔM_s$ and $S_{ψK_S}$ alone we find $|V_{cb}|=41.8(6)\times 10^{-3}$ and $|V_{ub}|=3.65(12)\times 10^{-3}$. We stress the importance of a precise measurement of $γ$. We obtain most precise SM predictions for considered branching ratios of rare K and B decays to date.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.