Paper detail

Searching for Gene Sets with Mutually Exclusive Mutations

Cancer cells evolve through random somatic mutations. "Beneficial" mutations which disrupt key pathways (e.g. cell cycle regulation) are subject to natural selection. Multiple mutations may lead to the same "beneficial" effect, in which case there is no selective advantage to having more than one of these mutations. Hence we are interested in finding sets of genes whose mutations are approximately mutually exclusive (anti-co-occurring) within the TCGA Pancancer dataset. In principle, finding the best set is NP Hard. Nevertheless, we will show how a new Mutation anti-co-OCcurrence Algorithm (MOCA) provides an effective greedy search and testing algorithm with guaranteed control of the familywise error rate or false discovery rate, by combining some under-appreciated ideas from frequentist hypothesis testing. These ideas include: (a) A novel exact conditional test for the tendency of multiple sets to have a large/small union/intersection, which generalises Fisher's exact test of 2x2 tables. (b) Randomised hypothesis tests for discrete distributions. (c) Stouffer's method for combining p-values. (d) Weighted multiple hypothesis testing. A new approach to setting a-priori weights which generates additional implicit hypothesis tests is suggested, and allows us to preserve almost all statistical power when testing pairs despite introducing a combinatorially large number of additional hypotheses.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.