Paper detail

Search for neutrinoless double beta decay with the NEMO-3 detector: first results

The NEMO-3 detector, which has been operating in the Frejus Underground Laboratory since February 2003, is devoted to searching for neutrinoless double beta decay (ββ0 ν). The expected performance of the detector has been successfully achieved. Half-lives of the two neutrinos double beta decay (ββ2 ν$) have been measured for ^{100} Mo, ^{82}Se, ^{96}Zr, ^{116}Cd and ^{150}Nd. After 265 days of data collection from February 2003 until March 2004, no evidence for neutrinoless double beta decay (ββ0 ν) was found from \sim 7 kg of ^{100} Mo and \sim 1 kg of ^{82} Se. The corresponding lower limits for the half-lives are 3.5 \times 10^{23} years at 90% C.L for ^{100} Mo and 1.9 \times 10^{23} years for ^{82}Se. Limits for the effective Majorana neutrino mass are < \hspace{-0.5mm} m_ν \hspace{-0.5mm} > < 0.7-1.2 eV for ^{100} Mo and \linebreak < \hspace{-0.5mm} m_{ν\hspace{-0.5mm} > < 1.3-3.2 eV for ^{82}Se. Radon is the dominant background today and a Radon-free purification system will be in operation by the end of september 2004. The NEMO-3 expected sensitivity after 5 years of data is 0.2 eV.

preprint2004arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.