Search for an anomalous excess of charged-current quasi-elastic νeν_e interactions with the MicroBooNE experiment using Deep-Learning-based reconstruction

preprint2022arXivOpen access
MicroBooNE collaborationP. AbratenkoR. AnJ. AnthonyL. ArellanoJ. AsaadiA. AshkenaziS. BalasubramanianB. BallerC. BarnesG. BarrV. BasqueL. Bathe-PetersO. Benevides RodriguesS. BerkmanA. BhanderiA. BhatM. BishaiA. BlakeT. BoltonJ. Y. BookL. CamilleriD. CaratelliI. Caro TerrazasF. CavannaG. CeratiY. ChenD. CianciG. H. CollinJ. M. ConradM. ConveryL. Cooper-TroendleJ. I. Crespo-AnadonM. Del TuttoS. R. DennisP. DetjeA. DevittR. DiurbaR. DorrillK. DuffyS. DytmanB. EberlyA. EreditatoJ. J. EvansR. FineG. A. Fiorentini AguirreR. S. FitzpatrickB. T. FlemingN. FoppianiD. FrancoA. P. FurmanskiD. Garcia-GamezS. GardinerG. GeV. GentyS. GollapinniO. GoodwinE. GramelliniP. GreenH. GreenleeW. GuR. GuenetteP. GuzowskiL. HagamanO. HenC. HilgenbergG. A. Horton-SmithA. HourlierR. ItayC. JamesX. JiL. JiangJ. H. JoR. A. JohnsonY. J. JwaD. KalraN. KampN. KaneshigeG. KaragiorgiW. KetchumM. KirbyT. KobilarcikI. KresloI. LepeticK. LiY. LiK. LinB. R. LittlejohnW. C. LouisX. LuoK. ManivannanC. MarianiD. MarsdenJ. MarshallD. A. Martinez CaicedoK. MasonA. MastbaumN. McConkeyV. MeddageT. MettlerK. MillerJ. MillsK. MistryT. MohayaiA. MoganJ. MoonM. MooneyA. F. MoorC. D. MooreL. Mora LepinJ. MousseauM. MurphyD. NaplesA. Navrer-AgassonM. Nebot-GuinotR. K. NeelyD. A. NewmarkJ. NowakM. NunesO. PalamaraV. PaoloneA. PapadopoulouV. PapavassiliouS. F. PateN. PatelA. PaudelZ. PavlovicE. PiasetzkyI. Ponce-PintoS. PrinceX. QianJ. L. RaafV. RadekaA. RafiqueM. Reggiani-GuzzoL. RenL. C. J. RiceL. RochesterJ. Rodriguez RondonM. RosenbergM. Ross-LonerganG. ScanaviniD. W. SchmitzA. SchukraftW. SeligmanM. H. ShaevitzR. SharankovaJ. ShiJ. SinclairA. SmithE. L. SniderM. SoderbergS. Soldner-RemboldP. SpentzourisJ. SpitzM. StancariJ. St. JohnT. StraussK. SuttonS. Sword-FehlbergA. M. SzelcW. TangK. TeraoC. ThorpeD. TotaniM. ToupsY. -T. TsaiM. A. UchidaT. UsherW. Van De PontseeleB. VirenM. WeberH. WeiZ. WilliamsS. WolbersT. WongjiradM. WospakrikK. WresiloN. WrightW. WuE. YandelT. YangG. YarbroughL. E. YatesH. W. YuG. P. ZellerJ. ZennamoC. Zhang

Abstract

We present a measurement of the νeν_e-interaction rate in the MicroBooNE detector that addresses the observed MiniBooNE anomalous low-energy excess (LEE). The approach taken isolates neutrino interactions consistent with the kinematics of charged-current quasi-elastic (CCQE) events. The topology of such signal events has a final state with 1 electron, 1 proton, and 0 mesons (1e1p1e1p). Multiple novel techniques are employed to identify a 1e1p1e1p final state, including particle identification that use two methods of deep-learning-based image identification, and event isolation using a boosted decision-tree ensemble trained to recognize two-body scattering kinematics. This analysis selects 25 νeν_e-candidate events in the reconstructed neutrino energy range of 200--1200\,MeV, while 29.0±1.9(sys)±5.4(stat)29.0 \pm 1.9_\text{(sys)} \pm 5.4_\text{(stat)} are predicted when using νμν_μ CCQE interactions as a constraint. We use a simplified model to translate the MiniBooNE LEE observation into a prediction for a νeν_e signal in MicroBooNE. A Δχ2Δχ^2 test statistic, based on the combined Neyman--Pearson χ2χ^2 formalism, is used to define frequentist confidence intervals for the LEE signal strength. Using this technique, in the case of no LEE signal, we expect this analysis to exclude a normalization factor of 0.75 (0.98) times the median MiniBooNE LEE signal strength at 90\% (2σ2σ) confidence level, while the MicroBooNE data yield an exclusion of 0.25 (0.38) times the median MiniBooNE LEE signal strength at 90\% (2σ2σ) confidence

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.