Paper detail

SEALing Neural Network Models in Secure Deep Learning Accelerators

Deep learning (DL) accelerators are increasingly deployed on edge devices to support fast local inferences. However, they suffer from a new security problem, i.e., being vulnerable to physical access based attacks. An adversary can easily obtain the entire neural network (NN) model by physically snooping the GDDR memory bus that connects the accelerator chip with DRAM memory. Therefore, memory encryption becomes important for DL accelerators on edge devices to improve the security of NN models. Nevertheless, we observe that traditional memory encryption solutions that have been efficiently used in CPU systems cause significant performance degradation when directly used in DL accelerators. The main reason comes from the big bandwidth gap between the GDDR memory bus and the encryption engine. To address this problem, our paper proposes SEAL, a Secure and Efficient Accelerator scheme for deep Learning. SEAL enhances the performance of the encrypted DL accelerator from two aspects, i.e., improving the data access bandwidth and the efficiency of memory encryption. Specifically, to improve the data access bandwidth, SEAL leverages a criticality-aware smart encryption scheme which identifies partial data that have no impact on the security of NN models and allows them to bypass the encryption engine, thus reducing the amount of data to be encrypted. To improve the efficiency of memory encryption, SEAL leverages a colocation mode encryption scheme to eliminate memory accesses from counters used for encryption by co-locating data and their counters. Our experimental results demonstrate that, compared with traditional memory encryption solutions, SEAL achieves 1.4 ~ 1.6 times IPC improvement and reduces the inference latency by 39% ~ 60%. Compared with a baseline accelerator without memory encryption, SEAL compromises only 5% ~ 7% IPC for significant security improvement.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.