Scrutinizing Various Phenomenological Interactions In The Context Of Holographic Ricci Dark Energy Models

In this paper, we examine two types of interacting holographic dark energy model using Pantheon supernova data, BAO BOSS DR12, CMB Planck 2015, fgas (gas mass fraction) and SZ/Xray (Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect and X-ray emission) data from galaxy clusters (GC). In particular, we considered the Holographic Ricci dark energy and Extended holographic Ricci dark energy models. During this analysis we considered seven type of phenomenological interaction terms (three linear and four non-linear) $Q_1=3Hbρ_{D}$, $Q_2=3Hbρ_{m}$, $Q_3=3Hb\left(ρ_{D}+ρ_m\right)$, $Q_4=3Hb\left(ρ_{D}+\frac{ρ_{D}^2}{ρ_{D}+ρ_m}\right)$, $Q_5=3Hb\left(ρ_{m}+\frac{ρ_{m}^2}{ρ_{D}+ρ_m}\right)$, $Q_6=3Hb\left(ρ_{D}+ρ_{m}+\frac{ρ_{D}^2}{ρ_{D}+ρ_m}\right)$, $Q_7=3Hb\left(ρ_{D}+ρ_{m}+\frac{ρ_{m}^2}{ρ_{D}+ρ_m}\right)$ respectively. To find the best model we apply Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) and use the $Λ$CDM as the referring model for comparison. Using AIC and BIC models selection method we note that the $Q_1$ and $Q_4$ interaction terms are favored by observational data within the context of the holographic Ricci dark energy models. The obtained results also demonstrated that the considered types of holographic Ricci dark energy model are not favored by observational data since the $Λ$CDM is considered as the reference model. We also observed that the values of the deceleration parameter and the transition redshift for all models are compatible with the latest observational data and Planck 2015. In addition, we studied the jerk parameter for all models. Using our modified CAMB code, we observed that the interacting models suppress the CMB spectrum at low multi-poles and enhances the acoustic peaks.

No reviews yet.

No comments yet.