Paper detail

Screening and the Pinch Point Paradox in Spin Ice

A pinch point singularity in the structure factor characterizes an important class of condensed matter that is a counterpoint to the paradigm of broken symmetry. This class includes water ice, charge ice and spin ice. Of these, dipolar spin ice affords the the pre-eminent model system because it has a well-established Hamiltonian, is simple enough to allow analytical theory and numerical simulation, and is well represented in experiment by Dy$_{2}$Ti$_{2}$O$_{7}$ and Ho$_{2}$Ti$_{2}$O$_{7}$. Nevertheless it is a considerable challenge to resolve the pinch points in simulation or experiment as they represent a very long range correlation. Here we present very high resolution simulations of the polarized neutron scattering structure factor of dipolar spin ice and new analytical theory of the pinch point profiles. We compare these with existing theory and experiment. We find that our simulations are consistent with theories that reveal the pinch points to be infinitely sharp, as a result of unscreened dipolar fields. However, neither simulation nor these theories are consistent with experiments, which instead is quantitatively captured by a theory that allows for screening of the dipolar fields and consequent strong broadening of the pinch points. This striking paradox is not easily resolved: broadening of the pinch points by random disorder seems to have been ruled out by existing theory, while deficiencies in the Hamiltonian description are not relevant. Intriguingly, we are left to consider the role of quantum fluctuations or the possibility of a fundamental correction to either the standard method of simulating dipolar systems, or the theory of polarized neutron scattering. More generally, our results may have relevance far beyond ice systems. For example, spin ice is a model Debye-Hückel (magnetic) electrolyte, so our basic observation that the screening length may diverge while...

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.