Paper detail

Screened-exchange density functional theory description of the electronic structure and phase stability of the chalcopyrite materials AgInSe$_2$ and AuInSe$_2$

We present a systematic assessment of the structural properties, the electronic density of states, the charge densities, and the phase stabilities of AgInSe$_2$ and AuInSe$_2$ using screened exchange hybrid density functional theory, and compare their properties to those of CuInSe$_2$. For AgInSe$_2$, hybrid density functional theory properly captures several experimentally measured properties, including the increase in the band gap and the change in the direction of the lattice distortion parameter $u$ in comparison to CuInSe$_2$. While the electronic properties of AuInSe$_2$ have not yet been experimentally characterized, we predict it to be a small gap ($\approx 0.15$ eV) semiconductor. We also present the phase stability of AgInSe$_2$ and AuInSe$_2$ according to screened-exchange density functional theory, and compare the results to predictions from conventional density functional theory, results tabulated from several online materials data repositories, and experiment (when available). In comparison to conventional density functional theory, the hybrid functional predicts phase stabilities of AgInSe$_2$ in better agreement with experiment: discrepancies in the calculated formation enthalpies are reduced by approximately a factor of three, from $\approx$ 0.20 eV/atom to $\approx$ 0.07 eV/atom, similar to the improvement observed for CuInSe$_2$. We further predict that AuInSe$_2$ is not a stable phase, and can only be present under non-equilibrium conditions.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.