Paper detail

Score-Guided Generative Adversarial Networks

We propose a Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) that introduces an evaluator module using pre-trained networks. The proposed model, called score-guided GAN (ScoreGAN), is trained with an evaluation metric for GANs, i.e., the Inception score, as a rough guide for the training of the generator. By using another pre-trained network instead of the Inception network, ScoreGAN circumvents the overfitting of the Inception network in order that generated samples do not correspond to adversarial examples of the Inception network. Also, to prevent the overfitting, the evaluation metrics are employed only as an auxiliary role, while the conventional target of GANs is mainly used. Evaluated with the CIFAR-10 dataset, ScoreGAN demonstrated an Inception score of 10.36$\pm$0.15, which corresponds to state-of-the-art performance. Furthermore, to generalize the effectiveness of ScoreGAN, the model was further evaluated with another dataset, i.e., the CIFAR-100; as a result, ScoreGAN outperformed the other existing methods, where the Fréchet Inception Distance (FID) was 13.98.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.