Paper detail

Scheduling Precedence-Constrained Jobs on Related Machines with Communication Delay

We consider the problem of scheduling $n$ precedence-constrained jobs on $m$ uniformly-related machines in the presence of an arbitrary, fixed communication delay $ρ$. We consider a model that allows job duplication, i.e. processing of the same job on multiple machines, which, as we show, can reduce the length of a schedule (i.e., its makespan) by a logarithmic factor. Our main result is an $O(\log m \log ρ/ \log \log ρ)$-approximation algorithm for minimizing makespan, assuming the minimum makespan is at least $ρ$. Our algorithm is based on rounding a linear programming relaxation for the problem, which includes carefully designed constraints capturing the interaction among communication delay, precedence requirements, varying speeds, and job duplication. Our result builds on two previous lines of work, one with communication delay but identical machines (Lepere, Rapine 2002) and the other with uniformly-related machines but no communication delay (Chudak, Shmoys 1999). We next show that the integrality gap of our mathematical program is $Ω(\sqrt{\log ρ})$. Our gap construction employs expander graphs and exploits a property of robust expansion and its generalization to paths of longer length. Finally, we quantify the advantage of duplication in scheduling with communication delay. We show that the best schedule without duplication can have makespan $Ω(ρ/\log ρ)$ or $Ω(\log m/\log\log m)$ or $Ω(\log n/\log \log n)$ times that of an optimal schedule allowing duplication. Nevertheless, we present a polynomial time algorithm to transform any schedule to a schedule without duplication at the cost of a $O(\log^2 n \log m)$ factor increase in makespan. Together with our makespan approximation algorithm for schedules allowing duplication, this also yields a polylogarithmic-approximation algorithm for the setting where duplication is not allowed.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.