Paper detail

Scheduling MapReduce Jobs and Data Shuffle on Unrelated Processors

We propose constant approximation algorithms for generalizations of the Flexible Flow Shop (FFS) problem which form a realistic model for non-preemptive scheduling in MapReduce systems. Our results concern the minimization of the total weighted completion time of a set of MapReduce jobs on unrelated processors and improve substantially on the model proposed by Moseley et al. (SPAA 2011) in two directions. First, we consider each job consisting of multiple Map and Reduce tasks, as this is the key idea behind MapReduce computations, and we propose a constant approximation algorithm. Then, we introduce into our model the crucial cost of data shuffle phase, i.e., the cost for the transmission of intermediate data from Map to Reduce tasks. In fact, we model this phase by an additional set of Shuffle tasks for each job and we manage to keep the same approximation ratio when they are scheduled on the same processors with the corresponding Reduce tasks and to provide also a constant ratio when they are scheduled on different processors. This is the most general setting of the FFS problem (with a special third stage) for which a constant approximation ratio is known.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.