Paper detail

SCALPEL3: a scalable open-source library for healthcare claims databases

This article introduces SCALPEL3, a scalable open-source framework for studies involving Large Observational Databases (LODs). Its design eases medical observational studies thanks to abstractions allowing concept extraction, high-level cohort manipulation, and production of data formats compatible with machine learning libraries. SCALPEL3 has successfully been used on the SNDS database (see Tuppin et al. (2017)), a huge healthcare claims database that handles the reimbursement of almost all French citizens. SCALPEL3 focuses on scalability, easy interactive analysis and helpers for data flow analysis to accelerate studies performed on LODs. It consists of three open-source libraries based on Apache Spark. SCALPEL-Flattening allows denormalization of the LOD (only SNDS for now) by joining tables sequentially in a big table. SCALPEL-Extraction provides fast concept extraction from a big table such as the one produced by SCALPEL-Flattening. Finally, SCALPEL-Analysis allows interactive cohort manipulations, monitoring statistics of cohort flows and building datasets to be used with machine learning libraries. The first two provide a Scala API while the last one provides a Python API that can be used in an interactive environment. Our code is available on GitHub. SCALPEL3 allowed to extract successfully complex concepts for studies such as Morel et al (2017) or studies with 14.5 million patients observed over three years (corresponding to more than 15 billion healthcare events and roughly 15 TeraBytes of data) in less than 49 minutes on a small 15 nodes HDFS cluster. SCALPEL3 provides a sharp interactive control of data processing through legible code, which helps to build studies with full reproducibility, leading to improved maintainability and audit of studies performed on LODs.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.