Paper detail

Scaling Strongly Consistent Replication

Strong consistency replication helps keep application logic simple and provides significant benefits for correctness and manageability. Unfortunately, the adoption of strongly-consistent replication protocols has been curbed due to their limited scalability and performance. To alleviate the leader bottleneck in strongly-consistent replication protocols, we introduce Pig, an in-protocol communication aggregation and piggybacking technique. Pig employs randomly selected nodes from follower subgroups to relay the leader's message to the rest of the followers in the subgroup, and to perform in-network aggregation of acknowledgments back from these followers. By randomly alternating the relay nodes across replication operations, Pig shields the relay nodes as well as the leader from becoming hotspots and improves throughput scalability. We showcase Pig in the context of classical Paxos protocols employed for strongly consistent replication by many cloud computing services and databases. We implement and evaluate PigPaxos, in comparison to Paxos and EPaxos protocols under various workloads over clusters of size 5 to 25 nodes. We show that the aggregation at the relay has little latency overhead, and PigPaxos can provide more than 3 folds improved throughput over Paxos and EPaxos with little latency deterioration. We support our experimental observations with the analytical modeling of the bottlenecks and show that the rotating of the relay nodes provides the most benefit for reducing the bottlenecks and that the throughput is maximized when employing only 1 randomly rotating relay node.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.