Paper detail

Scaling of local roughness distributions

Local roughness distributions (LRDs) are studied in the growth regimes of lattice models in the Kardar-Parisi-Zhang (KPZ) class in 1+1 and 2+1 dimensions and in a model of the Villain-Lai-Das Sarma (VLDS) growth class in 2+1 dimensions. The squared local roughness w_2 is defined as the variance of the height inside a box of lateral size r and the LRD P_r(w_2) is sampled as this box glides along a surface with size L >> r. The variation coefficient C and the skewness S of the distributions are functions of the scaled box size r / xi, where xi(t) is a correlation length. For r <~ 0.3 xi, plateaus of C and S are observed, but with a small time dependence. For a quantitative characterization of the universal LRD, extrapolation of these values with power-law corrections in time are performed. The reliability of this procedure is confirmed in 1+1 dimensions by comparison of results of the restricted solid-on-solid model and theoretically predicted values of Edwards-Wilkinson interfaces. For r >> xi, C and S vanish because the LRD converges to a Dirac delta function. This confirms the inadequacy of extrapolations of amplitude ratios to r -> infinity, as proposed in recent works. On the other hand, it highlights the advantage of scaling LRDs by the average instead of scaling by the variance due to the usually higher accuracy of C compared to S. The scaled LRD of the VLDS model is very close to the KPZ one due to the small difference between their variation coefficients and the plateaus of C and S are very narrow due to the slow time increase of xi. These results suggest that experimental LRDs obtained in short growth times and with limited resolution may be inconclusive to determine their universality classes if data accuracy is low and/or data extrapolation to the long time limit is not feasible.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.