Paper detail

Scaling behavior of explosive percolation on the square lattice

Clusters generated by the product-rule growth model of Achlioptas, D'Souza, and Spencer on a two-dimensional square lattice are shown to obey qualitatively different scaling behavior than standard (random growth) percolation. The threshold with unrestricted bond placement (allowing loops) is found precisely using several different criteria based upon both moments and wrapping probabilities, yielding p_c = 0.526565 +/- 0.000005, consistent with the recent result of Radicchi and Fortunato. The correlation-length exponent nu is found to be close to 1. The qualitative difference from regular percolation is shown dramatically in the behavior of the percolation probability P_(infinity) (size of largest cluster), the susceptibility, and of the second moment of finite clusters, where discontinuities appears at the threshold. The critical cluster-size distribution does not follow a consistent power-law for the range of system sizes we study L </- 8192) but may approach a power-law with tau > 2 for larger L.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.