Paper detail

Scaling behavior of crystalline membranes: an $ε$-expansion approach

We study the scaling behavior of two-dimensional (2D) crystalline membranes in the flat phase by a renormalization group (RG) method and an $ε$-expansion. Generalization of the problem to non-integer dimensions, necessary to control the $ε$-expansion, is achieved by dimensional continuation of a well-known effective theory describing out-of-plane fluctuations coupled to phonon-mediated interactions via a scalar composite field, equivalent for small deformations to the local Gaussian curvature. The effective theory, which will be referred to as Gaussian curvature interaction (GCI) model, is equivalent to theories of elastic $D$-dimensional manifolds fluctuating in a $(D + d_{c})$-dimensional embedding space in the physical case $D = 2$ for arbitrary $d_{c}$. For $D\neq 2$, instead, the GCI model is not equivalent to a direct dimensional continuation of elastic membrane theory and it defines an alternative generalization to generic internal dimension $D$. We calculate explicitly RG functions at two-loop order and determine the exponent $η$ characterizing the long-wavelength scaling of correlation functions to order $ε^{2}$ in an $ε=(4-D)$-expansion. The self-consistent screening approximation (SCSA) for the GCI model is shown to be exact to O($ε^{2}$). For $d_{c} = 1$, the O($ε^{2}$) correction is suppressed by a small numerical prefactor. As a result, despite the large value of $ε= 2$, extrapolation of the first and second order results to $D = 2$ leads to very close numbers, $η= 0.8$ and $η\simeq 0.795$. The calculated exponent values are close to earlier reference results obtained by non-perturbative RG, the SCSA and numerical simulations. These indications suggest that a perturbative analysis of the GCI model could provide an useful framework for accurate quantitative predictions of the scaling exponent even at $D = 2$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.