Paper detail

Saturated fusion systems on $p$-groups of maximal class

For a prime number $p$, a finite $p$-group of order $p^n$ has maximal class if it has nilpotency class $n-1$. Here we examine saturated fusion systems on maximal class $p$-groups and, in particular, we describe all the reduFor a prime number $p$, a finite $p$-group of order $p^n$ has maximal class if and only if it has nilpotency class $n-1$. Here we examine saturated fusion systems $\mathcal F$ on maximal class $p$-groups $S$ of order at least $p^4$. The Alperin-Goldschmidt Theorem for saturated fusion systems yields that $\mathcal F$ is entirely determined by the $\mathcal F$-automorphisms of its $\mathcal F$-essential subgroups and of $S$ itself. If an $\mathcal F$-essential subgroup either has order $p^2$ or is non-abelian of order $p^3$, then it is called an $\mathcal F$-pearl. The facilitating and technical theorem in this work shows that an $\mathcal F$-essential subgroup is either an $\mathcal F$-pearl, or one of two explicitly determined maximal subgroups of $S$. This result is easy to prove if $S$ is a $2$-group and can be read from the work of D'\iaz, Ruiz, and Viruel together with that of Parker and Semeraro when $p=3$. The main contribution is for $p \ge 5$ as in this case there is no classification of the maximal class $p$-groups. The main Theorem describes all the reduced saturated fusion systems on a maximal class $p$-group of order at least $p^4$ and follows from two more extensive theorems. These two theorems describe all saturated fusion systems, not restricting to the reduced ones for example, on exceptional and non-exceptional maximal class $p$-groups respectively. As a corollary, we have the easy to remember result that states that, if $O_p(\mathcal F)=1$, then either $\mathcal F$ has $\mathcal F$-pearls or $S$ is isomorphic to a Sylow $p$-subgroup of $\mathrm G_2(p)$ with $p\ge 5$ and the fusion systems are explicitly described.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.