Paper detail

SAR image wave spectra to retrieve the thickness of grease-pancake sea ice using viscous wave models

Young sea ice composed of grease and pancake ice (GPI), as well as thin floes, considered to be the most common form of sea ice fringing Antarctica, is now becoming the 'new normal' also in the Arctic. Investigations to determine how an increase in GPI is affecting the climate in the far north and globally, require specific tools to monitor the GPI's thickness distribution. Directional wave spectra from satellite SAR imagery are used to determine the change in wave dispersion as a wave train enters GPI fields. The ice cover thickness is then estimated by fitting the dispersion data with two models of wave propagation in ice cover ocean: the Keller's model and the close-packing (CP) model. For both models, an empirical constitutive equation for GPI viscosity as a function of the ice thickness is derived and discussed. Examples of GPI thickness retrievals are shown for a Sentinel-1 C band SAR image taken in the Beaufort Sea on 1 November 2015, and three CosmoSkyMed X band SAR images taken in the Weddell Sea on March 2019. The estimated GPI thicknesses are consistent with concurrent SMOS measurements and the available local samplings.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.